SEC moves against Longtop Technologies for failing to file accurate reports

The SEC has filed an administrative proceeding against Chinese company Longtop Financial Technologies, Ltd. (PInk Sheets: LGFTY:PK), saying the company had failed to file its financial report for the year ended March 31, and that its reports for 2008, 2009 and 2010 could no longer be relied upon.

According to the Wall Street Journal, the trouble started for Longtop in May when Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu resigned as its auditor after the company resisted its attempts to verify its bank balances. The New York Stock Exchange delisted Longtop in August and the company has been trading in the over-the-counter market since.
The government is also seeking access to Deloitte’s records on Longtop through a¬†separate¬†lawsuit, according to the WSJ, but the firm is resisting, saying it’s not been given permission by Chinese regulators to release any information.
The SEC’s move, if successful, could get Longtop kicked out of U.S. financial markets altogether and is the latest in a string of bad regulatory news for Chinese companies trading in the United States. In June, the SEC issued a warning against Chinese companies that have gone public in the U.S. through reverse mergers and has already suspended trading in dozens of such firms.

Canadian judge forces DeepCapture.com to pull content

A Canadian judge has ordered DeepCapture.com, a U.S.-based “anti-naked shorting” web site, off the Internet after a penny stock promoter accused the site of defamation.
Altaf Nazerali, a stock promoter in Victoria, British Columbia, claimed in a lawsuit that the site, edited by former Columbia Journalism Review columnist Mark Mitchell, falsely portrayed him as “a criminal, arms dealer, drug dealer, terrorist, Baud artist, gangster, mobster, member of the mafia, dishonest, dangerous and not to be trusted.” 
The defendants in the case also included Patrick Byrne, the chief executive of Overstock.com (Nasdaq: OSTK), and High Plains Investments LLC, a fund that Byrne controls. Nazerali alleged in his suit that Byrne owns Deep Capture LLC, the company behind DeepCapture.com.
 
Nazerali filed suit in Canada on Oct. 19 and an injunction was issued the same day, according to The Province. Nazerali also named Google Inc., as a defendant, for indexing and linking to the site, as well as GoDaddy.com, the site’s registrar.
Deepcapture.com’s content has been offline since the injunction was issued.
While DeepCapture.com is registered to a proxy, on an archived version of the site Byrne lists himself as a Deep Capture reporter and the source of its funding. The site described itself as “a new approach to journalism” and claimed that “that powerful actors have been able to influence or take control of not just the regulators, but also law enforcement, elected officials, national media, and the intellectual establishment. It is our mission to expose this ‘deep capture.’”
Since 2005, Byrne has been complaining that a hidden cabal of hedge funds, brokerages and other financial firms have been systematically seeking to undermine companies — including Overstock — through illegal “naked shorting” of their shares. Byrne contends that journalists, regulators and others have been co-opted by the group. 
 
It’s unclear if an injunction also was issued against Google, named in the suit because it indexed and linked deepcapture.com. Searches on Google.com for “Altaf Nazerali” and “Ali Nazerali” still returns links to Deep Capture’s story.
On an investor’s forum, a post attributed to Byrne said: “Gosh, I go off-line for a few days of R&R and look what happens. It looks like Ali Nazerali wants to go a few rounds. Happy to oblige.” 
Nazerali is no stranger to controversy. He or his investment funds have been involved in a number of public companies that have drawn scrutiny from news organizations and regulators.

‘Corporate investigator’ issues scathing report on Telestone Technologies

Jadeorstone.com, which bills itself as a “corporate investigator aimed at Chinese companies traded overseas” issued a report on Telestone Technologies Corp., a Beijing telecommunications company whose financial reporting and history were the subject of previous Sharesleuth reports.

Jadeorstone’s report on Telestone (Nasdaq: TSTC) alleged that:
  • The company’s production capacity is roughly 75 percent below the figure listed in its official statements
  • Telestone’s core wireless communications technology – WFDS 1 – is simplistic and easily duplicated.
  • There are egregious gaps between Telestone’s reported revenue and income in its Securities and Exchange Commission filings and those in its local
    Chinese tax filings.
The author of Jadeorstone’s report, which comes in at over 30 pages and is replete with photos of Telestone’s sometimes empty offices and production facilities, remained anonymous. Jadeorstone said its findings “were attained from on-site visits to all of the company’s main facilities and interviews with company’s employees, among other sources.” Read the full report.

California attorney general alleges that lawyers and telemarketers defrauded desperate homeowners





The California Attorney General’s office has
filed a complaint against Mitchell J. Stein — who was featured in a Sharesleuth
investigation
in 2008 — alleging that he and others participated in a scheme to deceive desperate homeowners into paying thousands of dollars each to join dubious lawsuits against their mortgage lenders.



According to the complaint, the lawyers and telemarketers involved in the scheme led the homeowners to believe that the suits would halt foreclosures on their homes, reduce their loan balances, bring them financial settlements, and possibly eliminate their mortgages entirely.



Authorities say the ring solicited homeowners in 17 states and persuaded at least 2,500 of them to pay as much as $10,000 each to join suits, some of which were never filed.


Stein, a Californa-based lawyer, was involved in the creation and development of Recom Managed Systems Inc., a medical device company that went public through a reverse merger. It later changed its name to Signalife Inc., and is currently known as Heart Tronics Inc. (Pink Sheets: HRTT.PK).


The attorney general’s office said in a press release that all of defendants had their assets seized and were enjoined from continuing their activities.

SEC issues warning about reverse mergers

The Securities and Exchange Commission says investors should be “especially careful” given the potential risks of investing in companies that have gone public through reverse mergers, either because they may be undercapitalized or haven’t faced enough scrutiny from regulators. The agency issued an investor bulletin that described problems with some of those companies, including a number of Chinese businesses that used reverse mergers to get listings on U.S. exchanges.  ”The S.E.C. has suspended the trading in the shares of at least a dozen such companies,” says Dealbook. ” Some companies, the agency says, file questionable documents, while others file nothing at all for periods of time. Sometimes the risk comes from companies that have been using small accounting firms that cannot handle the workload of auditing a large businesses…”

Can defense attorneys be too zealous?

Robert Khuzami, director of the enforcement division at the Securities and Exchange Commission, talked in a recent speech about some of the ways he thinks defense attorneys cross the line into obstruction. “Mr. Khuzami’s comments sound like a directive for attorneys to exercise greater care in how they interact with the S.E.C.,” says Dealbook. But, contrast that with the government’s attempt to prosecute a GlaxoSmithKline lawyer for obstruction over the way she represented the company. The judge wouldn’t even let the case go to the jury, and acquitted her on the spot.

Research report alleges that Sino-Forest Corp. overstated assets, revenues

Muddy Waters LLC said in a research report that Sino-Forest Corp., a Canadian company with extensive timber holdings in China, has substantially overstated the amount of forest land it controls, as well as the amount of wood it has been harvesting.

Trading in the Mississauga, Ontario-based companys stock (TSX: TRE.TO) was halted by the Toronto Stock Exchange after the shares plunged 20 percent in less than 30 minutes. 

Muddy Waters said in its 33-page report that the land purchases that Sino-Forest has reported in China did not square with government records, and appear to be overstated by as much as $900 million. The report also included photographs of apartment buildings and other nondescript structures at the addresses listed for some of Sino-Forest’s major customers and financial partners.

Unlike other Chinese businesses that trade on North American exchanges, Sino-Forest has attracted some large, savvy investors, includging Paulson & Co., which has more than $30 billion in assets under management.

 

Whistleblower rules set to be finalized soon

The specifics of a new program that rewards whistleblowers for reporting corporate wrongdoing to the Securities and Exchange Commission are taking shape. But for the SEC “it looks to be ‘damned if you do, damned if you don’t,’” says Peter J. Henning in the New York Times. The agency has faced criticism from all sides, he says, and won’t likely be able to please everyone. Most interesting, though, will be how it handles the rules’ most outspoken critics: corporate America.

House lawmakers wonder why SEC hasn’t punished anyone over Stanford

“‘I don’t think the agency is going to change much because I don’t see anything where people are being held accountable and responsible,’ Rep. Steve Pearce (R-N.M.) said,” according to the Wall Street Journal. The panel investigating the Securities and Exchange Commission’s handling of the Stanford case — the agency knew there were problems with Stanford’s firm as early as 1997 but didn’t act — were told that a former SEC official responsible for blocking attempts to investigate Stanford, former Fort Worth Regional Office Enforcement Chief Spencer Barasch, might become the target of a federal criminal investigation to see if he broke any laws in representing Stanford after he left the agency in 2005.