Telestone Technologies revisited: SEC letters reveal doubts about revenues and receivables

Recently released letters between the Securities and Exchange Commission and Telestone Technologies Corp. (Pink Sheets: TSTC) show that regulators have significant concerns about the Chinese wireless communication company’s reported revenues.

The letters show that the SEC’s corporation finance division began questioning Telestone in September 2012 about its sales contracts with customers and its soaring accounts receivable. Telestone’s balance sheet at the end of that month listed its receivables at $276.3 million, before adjustments for doubtful accounts. That equaled three-fourths of the revenue it reported for 2009, 2010, 2011 and the first nine months of 2012.

The SEC asked Telestone to explain why it was so certain those receivables would be paid, given that its average collection time was rising, along with the amount owed. Last summer, after months of unsatisfactory answers, the SEC ordered Telestone to provide a schedule of all receivables originated between Jan. 1, 2009 and Sept. 30, 2012.

It said that schedule was to include:

  • The name of the customer
  • The date the final contract was signed
  • The amount due under the contract
  • The receivable created upon signing
  • The contractual terms for payment
  • The amounts and dates of payments

Telestone – which has been the subject of several previous Sharesleuth stories (see here here and here) did not provide the information, citing non-disclosure agreements. Instead, it simply submitted a list of receivables by geographic territory, with no additional details .

In November, the SEC told Telestone that unless it could show that the contracts and payments were solid, it should change its revenue-recognition method, restate its 2011 financials and announce that its results from prior years should no longer be relied upon.

Telestone did neither. So in February, the corporation finance division told Telestone it was ending its review and would take further action “consistent with our obligations under the federal securities laws.” That included posting the letters.


Telestone was one of 11 Chinese companies that stock promoter S. Paul Kelley helped to bring public through reverse mergers with U.S.-listed shell companies.

The SEC brought fraud charges last month against Kelley and four others in connection with two of those deals. It said in its complaint that Kelley and the others concealed the large ownership stakes they received in Guanwei Recycling Corp. (Nasdaq: GPRC) and China Auto Logistics Inc. (Nasdaq: CALI), artificially inflated share prices through manipulative trading, then reaped millions by selling much of their stock.

Kelley already has settled the case, agreeing to pay more than $6.2 million in disgorgement, penalties and interest.

A third company Kelley helped to bring public, Kandi Technologies Group Inc. (Nasdaq: KNDI) disclosed earlier this year that it was the subject of an SEC investigation.

(Mark Cuban, majority owner of LLC, has no position, short or long, in any of the companies mentioned in this story. Chris Carey, editor of Sharesleuth, does not invest in individual stocks and has no position in any of the companies mentioned.)

Continue reading

Guanwei Recycling Corp. and Kandi Technologies Group Inc.: The Rui Wang Connection

A Chinese businessman who figures into a fraud case involving Guanwei Recycling Corp. (Nasdaq: GPRC) also has an intriguing connection to Kandi Technologies Group Inc. (Nasdaq: KNDI), whose shares were allegedly manipulated by the same group.

Securities and Exchange Commission filings show that the man, Rui Wang, is a member of Guanwei Recycling’s board of directors and was a consultant to Kandi.

The SEC brought charges last month against stock promoter S. Paul Kelley and four associates, saying they engaged in illegal schemes to bring Gaunwei Recycling and China Auto Logistics Inc. (Nasdaq: CALI) public in the United States.  The SEC said in its complaint that they concealed large ownership stakes they received through reverse-merger transactions, artificially inflated share prices through manipulative trading, then reaped millions by selling stock on the open market and in private transactions.

Kelley also helped Kandi go public, through a similarly structured reverse-merger deal that put large blocks of stock in the hands of undisclosed parties. He and another defendant, Roger D. Lockhart, already have settled the charges against them, agreeing to pay a combined $9.3 million in disgorgement, penalties and interest.

Guanwei Recycling and China Auto Logistics emphasized that they have not been accused of wrongdoing. But the SEC complaint, along with our additional research, raises further questions about their involvement in the Kelley group’s schemes.

For example:

–  The complaint said Kelley had “de facto control” over Chenxin International Ltd., which paid the U.S. legal, accounting, listing and investor-relations expenses for Guanwei Recycling, a plastics processor based in Fuqing.  Guanwei Recycling, however, has always said in its SEC filings that Chenxin International was controlled by Wang. The company described him as a longtime friend of its chairman and chief executive, Chen Min.

– The complaint said Lockhart and another defendant met with Kandi’s chief executive, Xiaoming Hu, in September 2009 and agreed to pay promoters to tout the company, and to boost its stock price through manipulative trading. Hu allegedly agreed that Kandi would provide an additional 350,000 shares to pay for the program. SEC filings show that a few weeks later, Kandi awarded a business-development contract to Wang and another man. They were to be paid with options to buy 350,000 shares of Kandi’s stock.

– The complaint said Kelley controlled Sino Peace Ltd., which covered the U.S. expenses for China Auto Logistics, a vehicle importer with headquarters in Tianjin. The complaint said Kelley also controlled another company, Easy Fame Asia Ltd. Sharesleuth previously reported that Easy Fame Asia got an unexplained distribution of stock in 2011 from an entity that held millions of shares for China Auto Logistics’ chief executive, Tong Shiping, and his wife, Cheng Weihong, also a senior executive and board member.

The timing of Kandi’s contract with Wang, and the number of shares involved, could be a coincidence. But given the charges against Kelly and his associates — and Kelley’s link to Wang at Guanwei Recycling — the deal might deserve additional regulatory scrutiny.

(Mark Cuban, majority owner of LLC, has no position, short or long, in any of the companies mentioned in this story. Chris Carey, editor of, does not invest in individual stocks and has no position in any of the companies.)

Continue reading